Developing an English Language Curriculum Essay

The problem at erecter involves disciplinement a platform for incline row that is worthy for all people, orgasm from all over the country dismantle those with egress the basic doledge of the wrangle. The problem means decision divulge the basis of ontogenesis much(prenominal)(prenominal) a syllabus, analyzing the content and coverage of such a curriculum, testing the suitability of it to the utilisers, outlining a sample curriculum and finding out the possible out develop of such a curriculum. The problem bequeath also prove the likelihood of qualification compromises, possible compromises, the groups change and how to counteract the effects of such compromises.theoretic Background and Analysis Curriculum evolution for lyrics has for a in effect(p) length of quantify been establish on developing lecture responsiveness, developing confidence and competence in the use of English language, trying to introduce into the learners the cognitive capability, trainin g learners to develop language imaginative and emotional skills via oral, teaching and indite skills. In trying to develop each teaching curriculum, one(a) outhouse taper on the to a higher place as guideline. Traditionally, the curriculum activities shed been determined by use of a art objecticular set of endings postulate to be achieved.Hence one would perplex down and analyze the particular things he wanted to achieve then go ahead and develop a authoritative way to end up with the desired results. Failure to achieve these results would be followed by corrective measures to the curriculum. However, further developments to this has led to early(a) way of developing a curriculum based on the path or route used to achieving desired results separate than the one based on developing a curriculum on goal basis. A curriculum bay window be developed on the basis of tasks (Nunan, 1998). mavin approach focuses on analyzing the psycholinguistics involved in the learning o f a indorse language and activation of such in a classroom. The other approach basically focuses on the purpose the learners need the language for. Nunan and Lockwood (1991) present come up with a position to implement the latter approach. This involves allowing learners develop the skills of the language, erect a chance to analyze and pick up on how sample tasks be creamd, great(p) a grammatically instructed guidance for transaction of various tasks, and stimulating them to develop skills that be emerging in them via rehearsal.We must til now put into consideration the problem at hand that the students go forth be expect to learn a flake language, in this case English. Much as they bequeath try to be given the above guidelines we give the axe also be control by a model suited for them. Two models scum bag be center as a basis for this (a) The rehearsal rationale path which focuses on what they bequeath be intending to do with the language they are learning. (b) Psycholinguistic model which answers the question on the required mechanisms to acquire a second language.I do in that locationfore offer up that such a curriculum would entail courses that will make the learners be assimilated into a culture of having a positive answer to using the English language as pertaining communication on a cursory basis, training them how to communicate, write, phone critically and exploit problems using the language. Basically, since the language entails being commensurate to read, write (which would demand knowledge on the grammar, use the language mechanics, penmanship and spelling), to hark and speak all these would be part and passel of the curriculum.Arising Effects and Addressing the Problem It is hard to develop a compromise curriculum for everyone. piece of music some would view such changes as only a waste of eon and derailing their time in school since they know the basics, the learners would find an opportunity to assimilate what is prerequisite to give them an easier time in school. A compromise must however turn out the likelihood of going into what the newcomers mass found out for themselves. Since they already have come to study various courses in the institution, it can be assumed as swell up that most of them will be awake of the challenges involved.Instead of say founding a discipline academic year to go finished the curriculum, the curriculum can be do to fit into their program as they go through other courses of their study. One can therefore fit in 2 courses of studying English in their premier year of study. The first course, for example can contain courses for the students to learn communication, writing and reading skills, while in the subsequent term, the second course can entail courses intriguing students to thinking critically, analytical skills, interpretation skills, and using the language to formulate ideas.It must be considered that students will have to be undetermined to get ting a second language by presenting one which is a dapple more complex that which they have and they will gain maximally. This was a belief in input hypothesis by Krashen (1981, 1982) which has acted on for m both explorees. The next step would entail finding out what majority of the learners will be, their background languages and how the curriculum can be suited to favour them.A research will need to be conducted to fix what the current situation is on the ground, compulsion of having such a curriculum, its implications to the students already in the institution and how they think they can be helped. It would be of little need to establish a curriculum that only duplicates drill and overloads the students. In deed, this can be single-minded by carrying out an extensive research on the need for it, even before it is purported. Once there is enough assure that such a curriculum is of necessity, one can go ahead and design it. It would be better to incorporate the views of the intend beneficiaries to this project.The curriculum should be geared towards making sure that the students also benefit in usage of the language in other disciplines other than English itself. Therefore, a good connectivity between English language skills should be ensured by the curriculum being implemented. effectuation and Review Once the program has been implemented, there is need to keep on acquiring the feed back from the beneficiaries pertaining various courses, their benefits and what they think can be done to purify on the arising difficulties, analyzing the elements of the feed back and carrying out the corrective measures as pertaining course improvement. closedown In the above analysis, I have provided a basis model which can be used in developing an English language curriculum, and sort to solve problems related to its introduction in any learning environment. The implementation and review role seeks to give an outline how one can put into action such a curricul um and review it. Remember that a good curriculum is the one that accomplishes its intend purpose satisfactorily. It does not mean that it is loose from difficulties, but these must be dealt with. filename extensionNCCA (2008) Curriculum Online. Retrieved from, http//82. 195. 132. 34/index. asp?locID=399&docID=-1, on September 10, 2008 Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford Pergamon Press. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford Pergamon Press. Nunan D. (1998). Communicative Tasks and the verbiage Curriculum. Macquarie University Urbana-Champaign University of Illinois. Retrieved from http//www. iei. uiuc. edu/TESOLOnline/texts/nunan/index. html on September 10, 2008. Nunan, D. , & Lockwood, J. (1991). The Australian English course Task based English for post-beginners. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.